Legal Opinion

Pearce v. Ollie

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1992No. 17744Published

1Opinion of the Court

826 P.2d 888 (1992)

121 Idaho 539

John Franklin PEARCE and Ethel Pearce, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross Respondents,

v.

Steven OLLIE, M.D.; and John and Jane Does I Through V, Whose True Names are Unknown, Defendants-Respondents. and

Valley County Hospital, Cascade, Idaho, Defendant-Respondent, Cross Appellant, and

John Moser, M.D., Defendant.

No. 17744.

Supreme Court of Idaho. Boise term, January 1991.

February 4, 1992.

E. Lee Schlender, Hailey, for plaintiffs-appellants-cross respondents.

Quane, Smith, Howard & Hull, Boise, for defendant-respondent Ollie. Elizabeth G. Roper argued.

Hawley…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  4. Doe v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  5. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API