State v. Jankowitz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The important question presented by the record is whether the statute, G. S. 1923, § 10098, providing that a person is guilty of assault in the second degree when he “shall assault another with intent to commit a felony,” means that the felony must be an essential ingredient of the attack upon the person assaulted. The appellant’s position might be construed as saying, “Yes, I shot the woman but you cannot convict me because I intended to shoot her husband only.” Some authorities support appellant’s contention. See State v.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. MulhallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- State v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Dunaway v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010