Legal Opinion
Rankin v. Shanker
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 30, 1968PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Ftrim.
These appeals require us to pass upon a fundamental question of high importance in connection with the enforcement of the provisions of the recently enacted Taylor Law (L. 1967, ch. 392; Civil Service Law, art. 14, §§ 200-212). Are public employees or the unions which represent them entitled, as a matter of right, to trial by jury in a criminal contempt proceeding brought against them for alleged violation of section 210 (subd. 1) of that statute, in that (as to the employees) they engaged in a strike and (as to the organizations) they instigated, encouraged or condoned such…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Dyke v. Taylor Implement Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Harbolic v. BergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- City of San Diego v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local 127California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Besser v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Fumarelli v. Marsam Development, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. County of OneidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.