Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Dr. Williams R.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 25, 2002No. 01 CIV. 2642(WCC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Angel Martinez brings the instant action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Dr. Kyee Tint Maw, Dr. John Perilli and Physician Assistant (“P.A.”) Philip Williams alleging deliberate indifference to medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendants move to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6), arguing that plaintiff failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. KellyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Veloz v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Angulo v. Nassau CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Smart v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Sulton v. WrightDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.