Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. County of Reynolds v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 28, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.

Original proceeding in mandamus. Reynolds County, as relator, seeks to compel the State Highway Commission, as respondent, to refund moneys expended by said county in the construction of certain road and bridge projects therein. Respondent waived the issuance of the writ and made return to the four counts of the petition as and for the writ. The reply is specific denials with a plea that respondent is estopped to deny that the projects are in the State Highway system. , •

Count one seeks refund for the construction of a bridge across Logan Creek. Count two seeks refund for the construction of.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Castilo v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  2. State ex rel. McWilliams v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  3. State ex rel. McWilliams v. BatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. State Ex Rel. Liberty Township of Stoddard County v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  5. Moxley v. Pike CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bush v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Hannibal v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. State Ex Rel. Russell v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Volker v. KirbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. Miller v. Ste. Genevieve CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API