Hopper v. Hopper
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Hudson, special J., ’Cherokee, January, 1901. Action on two promissory notes by D. J. andl C. C. Hopper, as administrators of W. Junius Hopper, against Samuel L. Hopper. The Judge charged the jury as follows :' “This action is brought by the administrators of the estate' of W. Junius Hopper against Samuel Hopper upon two notes. The notes reading as follows: ‘$500.00. One day after date, I -promise to pay W. J. Hopper $500 borrowed money.
Read the full summary
Before Hudson, special J., ’Cherokee, January, 1901. Action on two promissory notes by D. J. andl C. C. Hopper, as administrators of W. Junius Hopper, against Samuel L. Hopper. The Judge charged the jury as follows :' “This action is brought by the administrators of the estate' of W. Junius Hopper against Samuel Hopper upon two notes. The notes reading as follows: ‘$500.00. One day after date, I -promise to pay W. J. Hopper $500 borrowed money. January ist, 1884. S. T. Hopper.’ ‘$550.00. One day after date I promise to pay W. J. Hopper $550 'borrowed money. January ist, 1885. S. H Hopper.’…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the 'Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice McIver.
This action was commenced some time in May, 1899, by plaintiffs as administrators of the estate of W. Junius Hopper, deceased, to recover the balance claimed to be due upon two promissory notes, ' executed by the defendant and made payable to plaintiffs’ intestate, for borrowed money. The first of these notes bears date 1st January, 1884, and is payable one day after date, and is for the sum of $500. The second note, for the sum of $550, bears date 1st January, 1885, and is payable one day after date. These two notes were…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Field v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- The Mayor and Commonalty of Alexandria v. Patten and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carson v. Cook County Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Johnson v. BroomeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Wolfe v. Brannon Et Ux.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- McGhee v. MontgomerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Parish v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968