In Re In-Progress Trace Wire Communication
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
138 N.J. Super. 404 (1975)
351 A.2d 356
IN THE MATTER OF AN IN-PROGRESS TRACE OF A WIRE COMMUNICATION TO BE MADE TO AND INTERCEPTED OVER TELEPHONE FACILITY NUMBER, ETC.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 3, 1975.
Decided December 26, 1975.
Before Judges ALLCORN, KOLE and GAULKIN.
Mr. R. Benjamin Cohen, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant State of New Jersey (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Prosecutor of Essex County, attorney; Mr. John A. Matthews, III, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel).
Mr. Thomas E. Walsh, Jr. argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Bell…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Melvin Corngold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. FocarileDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- State v. DroutmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976