Legal Opinion

In Re In-Progress Trace Wire Communication

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 26, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

138 N.J. Super. 404 (1975)

351 A.2d 356

IN THE MATTER OF AN IN-PROGRESS TRACE OF A WIRE COMMUNICATION TO BE MADE TO AND INTERCEPTED OVER TELEPHONE FACILITY NUMBER, ETC.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 3, 1975.

Decided December 26, 1975.

Before Judges ALLCORN, KOLE and GAULKIN.

Mr. R. Benjamin Cohen, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant State of New Jersey (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Prosecutor of Essex County, attorney; Mr. John A. Matthews, III, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel).

Mr. Thomas E. Walsh, Jr. argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Bell…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Melvin Corngold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. United States v. FocarileDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. State v. DroutmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API