Legal Opinion

M.Z. Discount Clothing Corp. v. Meyninger

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 12, 1997No. CV 96-4828(RJD)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

DEARIE, District Judge.

This is an action to recover proceeds of two insurance policies. Plaintiff M.Z. Discount Clothing Corp. (“M.Z.”) was insured under a $15,000 Commercial Crime Insurance Policy (the “FEMA Policy”) issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency' (“FEMA”).1 M.Z. was also covered by an *184$85,000 excess policy issued by certain underwriters at Lloyds’ (“Lloyds”). Less than one month after coverage under the Lloyds policy commenced, M.Z. claimed that certain of its inventory was stolen in a burglary. M.Z. claimed a loss in excess of $100,000, thus…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. White v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Power Authority v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API