Legal Opinion

Ludwinska v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1934No. Appeal 121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Balbrige, J.,

This appeal is from the refusal of the learned court below to enter judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in a suit brought on a policy of insurance on the life of Victoria Ludwinska, issued on October 29, 1930, wherein the plaintiff was named as beneficiary.

The policy contained the following incontestable clause: “After this policy shall have been in force during the lifetime of the insured for a period of two years from date of its issue, it shall be incontestable, except for non-payment of premium, or for failure to have the policy endorsed in case…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reagan v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Feierman v. Eureka Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Youngblood v. Prud. Ins. Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Brady v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Panopoulos v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Life & Accident Insurance v. KesslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API