Ludwinska v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Balbrige, J.,
This appeal is from the refusal of the learned court below to enter judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in a suit brought on a policy of insurance on the life of Victoria Ludwinska, issued on October 29, 1930, wherein the plaintiff was named as beneficiary.
The policy contained the following incontestable clause: “After this policy shall have been in force during the lifetime of the insured for a period of two years from date of its issue, it shall be incontestable, except for non-payment of premium, or for failure to have the policy endorsed in case…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reagan v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Feierman v. Eureka Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Youngblood v. Prud. Ins. Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Brady v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Panopoulos v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. KesslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935