Legal Opinion
Nedds v. Calderon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 2012No. 08-56520PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner-Appellant Darryl Nedds (“Nedds”), a California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s holding that his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition is time-barred by the one-year statute of limitations created by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). The district court dismissed Nedds’ habeas petition solely for untimeliness and did not reach the merits of Nedds’ claim. Accordingly, the only issue before us is whether Nedds timely filed his federal habeas petition.
Nedds argues that he is entitled to equitable tolling…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Cary Williams v. Timothy FilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Julius Robinson v. G. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Chance Blackman v. Theresa CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Clint Livermore v. Gary Sandor, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Williams v. BirkettDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.