Legal Opinion

Maxfield v. Willey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1881PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Saginaw. Bill of foreclosure. Complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This is a foreclosure suit. The mortgage is not disputed, nor tbe amount due upon tbe debt, and tbe controversy is narrowed to a question whether complainant is entitled to recover certain sums as payments upon taxes.

Tbe mortgage was given by defendant Seth Willey: it bears date February 14, 1872, and was conditioned among other things for tbe payment by tbe mortgagor of all taxes and assessments that might bave been or might be levied or assessed upon tbe mortgaged land. It was also provided therein that in case of non-payment of tbe debt and inter*254est, or of the taxes assessed or levied on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Raymond v. HinksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nickum v. GastonOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Koch v. Kiron State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. Shepard v. VincentWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Jacobsen v. NieboerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Stinson v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API