Shepard v. Vincent
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Denney, J., entered September 10, 1904, in favor of the defendants, upon the pleadings and the opening statement of counsel, dismissing an action to reform a deed as a mortgage, and to redeem therefrom.
1Opinion of the CourtGrow, J.
This action was commenced by appellant, . Ella M. Shepard, against W. H. Vincent, S. Adelle Vincent, his wife, E. E. Williams and Sarah L. Williams, his wife, and O. B. Whitney and Alice Whitney, his wife, respondents, for the purpose of having a certain deed declared to be a mortgage, and securing a redemption therefrom. The complaint alleged that, at the time of its filing, and at all of the dates therein mentioned, appellant-had been, and was, the owner in fee simple of lots 6, 7, and 8, in block 2, in Thomas’ Addition to Mukilteo, as her separate property and estate; that on the 1st day…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Maxfield v. WilleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Fisk v. BrunetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Stinson v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Ragor v. LomaxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
- Merritt v. CoreyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Integrity Trust Co. v. St. Rita B. & L. Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Stone v. MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Maher v. PotterWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Price v. SalisburySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Oregon Mortgage Co. v. Leavenworth Securities Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.