Legal Opinion

Ficklin v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 8, 2005No. A04A2326PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Reginald Ficklin appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to Hyundai Motor America, Inc. (“Hyundai”), on his complaint that Hyundai breached implied and express warranties when it sold him a new 2001 Hyundai Sonata. Ficklin contends the trial court erred by: (1) allowing Hyundai to submit a late affidavit in support of its motion for summary judgment; and (2) finding that he failed to submit competent, admissible evidence of actual damages. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Fulmore v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Monroe v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Dixon Dairy Farms, Inc. v. Conagra Feed Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Williams v. Dienes Apparatus, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moran v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Small v. Savannah International Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Hill v. MERCEDES BENZ USA, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. James v. Terex CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API