Legal Opinion
Hill v. MERCEDES BENZ USA, LLC
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 29, 2005No. A05A0114PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bernes, Judge.
This appeal arises from a warranty action commenced by Cheryl and Edna Hill against Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”) relating to their purchase of a new 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK 230 roadster. The trial court entered a comprehensive order granting summary judgment to MBUSA on all counts of the Hills’ complaint. The Hills now appeal from certain portions of that order, contending that the trial court erred in ruling that there was insufficient evidence as a matter of law to support their claims for breach of express and implied warranties, and in ruling that they failed to provide…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Long v. MarionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Fiat Auto U. S. A., Inc. v. HollumsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Johnson v. RooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Canal Insurance v. Savannah Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dierkes v. Crawford Orthodontic Care, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Klem v. Access Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Klem v. Access Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Randy B. Dalton v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019