Legal Opinion

Village of Prentice v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1968PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether Boho and Geng were employees for workmen’s compensation purposes at the time they sustained their injuries. This determination is a question of law if the facts are undisputed and if but one, if any, inference may reasonably be drawn from the evidence before the commission. On the other hand, it is well settled that “when facts are not in dispute but permit the drawing of different inferences therefrom, the drawing of one of such permissible inferences by the commission is an act of fact finding, and the inference so derived constitutes a finding of an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gant v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Scholz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Kolman v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Habrich v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Green Valley Co-Operative Dairy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, ETC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. Slope County Ex Rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Consolidation Coal Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kress Packing Co. v. KottwitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API