Legal Opinion

Payne v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 2, 2003No. C.A. 01-10118-NGPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

GERTNER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit on behalf of owners of homes in New England heated by radiant floor heating systems created and marketed by a now-defunct company called Heatway that include defendant Goodyear’s “Entran II” rubber hose. The complaint alleges that the hose is defective as designed — resulting in oxidation, hardening, cracks, and eventually leaks that cause property damage — and that Goodyear failed to adequately warn customers of known risks associated with its use.

The named plaintiffs…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  5. Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. MowbrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
  2. In re Credit Suisse-AOL Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  3. Donovan v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  4. Swack v. Credit Suisse First BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  5. Southern States Police Benevolent Ass'n v. First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API