Legal Opinion

United States v. Pete Johnson, F. Douglas Mavor, Jane Kendle Mavor, Nelson T. Bruce, and Cleo Bruce

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 7, 1958No. 15737PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought to recover tax deficiencies, assessed and paid, for the year 1948. Judgment was entered for plaintiffs, and the Government appeals.

The single question presented here is whether, in exercising their right to cut certain timber, the taxpayers were cutting timber “for sale,” within the meaning of § 117 (k) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. (1939), § 117 (k) (1). If so, as all concede, taxpayers were entitled to capital gains treatment on the proceeds received from such disposition of the logs. The trial court held that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carlen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  2. Helga Carlen v. Commissioner Of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. GiustinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Gilmore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  3. Wirkkala v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1960
  4. United States v. Erminio Giustina and Irene O. Giustina, United States of America v. Anselmo Giustina and Josephine Giustina, United States of America v. Natale B. Giustina and Jacqueline Giustina, United States of America v. Ehrman v. Giustina and Marion Lee GiustinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. Timber Conservation Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API