Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Patterson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided July 13, 2007No. 2006-CA-001280-MRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAMBERT, Judge.

The Arnolds appeal from a bench trial verdict granting title to a narrow strip of disputed property to the Pattersons. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm the trial court’s decision.

Issue and Legal Standards

The subject matter of this action to quiet title is a narrow gully beside a road that runs between the Arnold’s and Patterson’s respective real properties. The gully lies between the road and a fence on Patterson’s property. The Ar-nolds claim ownership of the narrow strip of land on the far side of the dividing road up to the Patterson’s fence. In contrast,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gosney v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
  2. Whittaker v. CecilKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Crawley v. MacKeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. Howard v. Kingmont Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987
  5. Lewis, Wilson & Hicks v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Turner v. C&R Asphalt, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2019
  2. Cut-N-Shoot, L.L.C. v. Bingham Greenebaum Doll, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
  3. Scott Stillwell v. Sam C. DeitweillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API