Legal Opinion

Lewis, Wilson & Hicks v. Durham

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 6, 1911PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Rockcastle Circuit Court. ’

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Coubt by

Judge Miller

— Reversing.

The appellee, Durham, sue'd' the- appellants. Lewis, Wilson & Hicks, in the- Rockcastle Circuit Court to recover damages for their unlawful and forcible entry npon 21 acres of land on the waters of Brush creek, which Durham claimed to own, and taking therefrom 786 saw-logs of'the alleged value of $3,318. The appellants answered, denying the ownership of Durham, and set up ownership of the land in themselves.

Appellants claim under a patent issued to- Elisha Parsons in 1850 for 100 acres of land, bounded as follows :

“Beginning at -two chestnuts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. King's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Pearson v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
  3. Louisville & N. R. R. v. HarrodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  4. Hogg v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  5. City of Louisville v. CainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cumberland Railroad v. GirdnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Carter v. Elk Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Danville Light, Power & Traction Co. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Stratton v. Northeast Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API