Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Kansas Town Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 7, 1904No. 13,611PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Wyandotte court of common pleas; William G. Holt, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*315The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

This litigation involves the title to a tract of land now forming a part of the city of Argentine, comprising about thirty-three acres, upon which over 200 houses are erected. It originated in an action of ejectment brought by C. M. Campbell against the occupants of the tract. Two persons named as defendants, R. R. Dunbar and Elizabeth Benns, are, in effect, plaintiffs, and will be so treated. The other defendants (of whom there are over 200), so far as practically important, are the Kansas Town Company, in whose behalf the tract was platted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pickering v. LomaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Lykins v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Lomax v. PickeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Courtney v. WoodworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  5. Usher v. HollisterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gordon v. MunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Drollinger v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Coryell v. HardySupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Rogers v. NoelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Yost v. GuinnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API