Legal Opinion

Burch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 29, 1999No. 98-996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellate counsel filed an Anders1 brief in this appeal. Appellant was afforded the opportunity but did not file a brief pro se. We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences and the imposition of costs and a public defender’s lien. Wright v. State, 720 So.2d 313, 23 Fla.L.Weekly D2562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249, 23 Fla.L.Weekly D2399 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). As in Locke, we certify the following question to be one of great public importance:

Does the failure of the trial court to orally pronounce each statutorily authorized cost individually at the time of sentencing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Locke v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API