Legal Opinion
Mintz v. Carlton House Partners, Ltd.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 7, 1991No. 2710PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, Judge:
This is an appeal from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County granting partial summary judgment in favor of the appellee, The Carlton House Partners, Ltd. (“Carlton House”). We affirm.
On November 29, 1984, the appellants, Howard B. and Heddie A. Mintz, (collectively “the Mintzes”), entered into a commercial lease agreement with an agent of Carlton House. The agreement contemplated the lease of premises located on the Arcade level of the Carlton House Apartments. By its terms, the lease was intended to operate for a term of one hundred and twenty-one months…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- In The Matter Of M. Frenville Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Bearoff v. Bearoff Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Donald Urrutia v. Harrisburg County Police Dept. Sean McCormack Asst. D.A. Denis Thomason, Donald UrrutiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Allegheny Intern., Inc. v. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- McArdle v. TronettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Dempsey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Hopewell Estates, Inc. v. KentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.