Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Rowe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1912No. 1718PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Nowata County; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action by Fred S. Rowe and others against Fred D. Bailey and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

This action was instituted in the court below by defendants iti error, hereinafter called plaintiffs, against plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, to recover $700 with interest as compensation for services rendered in compliance with a written contract executed by defendants on January 16, 1907, whereby plaintiffs were employed or authorized for a stated period of time to sell for defendants two certain oil leases, said compensation as alleged in the petition amounting to $600, and also to obtain judgment for the return of $100 paid by plaintiffs to defendants under written…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pettis Et Ux. v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. S. E. Crowley Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  3. Ullmann v. LandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Campbell v. ShermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Giles v. SwiftMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Worley v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. FainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API