Professional Marketing Distributors, Inc. v. Feldman Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Presiding Judge.
In its capacity as a judgment creditor of Lingard & Associates, Inc. (L&AI), appellee-plaintiff initiated the instant garnishment action against appellant-garnishee. After appellant had answered and denied its possession or control of any garnishable property, appellee filed a traverse, asserting that appellant had acquired L&AI’s inventory and equipment in a “bulk transfer” which did not comply with the applicable provisions of OCGA § 11-6-101 et seq. See Vincent Brass & Aluminum Co. v. Johnson, 149 Ga. App. 537, 538 (2a) (254 SE2d 752) (1979), rev’d on other grounds,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Express Co., S. A. I. v. Bomar Shoe Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Gainesville Feed & Poultry Co. v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Johnson v. Vincent Brass & Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Streamlight, Inc. v. International Health & Safety Corp. (In Re Streamlight, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Republic Steel Corp. v. Canyon Culvert Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crews v. WahlCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- ADI Fabricators, Inc. v. Harsco Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995