Legal Opinion

United States v. B. & W. Sportswear, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 30, 1943No. Cr. No. 39376PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ABRUZZO, District Judge.

The Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, made an application for an order to show cause, returnable July 26, 1943, why the defendants should not be found guilty of criminal contempt of court by reason of their failure to comply with a decree and judgment of this court, dated April 15, 1942.

The preliminary steps leading up to the obtaining of this order to show cause can be summarized as follows:

On April 15, 1942, a decree and judgment was entered against B. & W. Sportswear, Inc., and Benjamin Weintraub, Samuel B. Weintraub and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. SavinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Fleming v. AldermanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1943
  4. United States v. P. & W. COAT CO.District Court, E.D. New York · 1943

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Lawrence Victor Miller, A/K/A Larry MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Alek FidanianCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Mitchell v. FioreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  4. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Dept. Of Labor v. William Fiore, Ind. And D/B/A Fiore Trucking Company and William Fiore Contracting Company, the United States v. In Re William Fiore, Individually and Doing Business as Fiore Trucking and William Fiore Contracting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. FioreDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API