Legal Opinion

Ross v. Board of Liquor Control

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 4, 1954No. 5113PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*416OPINION

By THE COURT.

The Board of Liquor Control held that the appellees who were permit holders of a.class D-5 permit in Cincinnati did sell whiskey by the bottle for consumption off the premises and did sell on the permit premises intoxicating liquor in an original container which had been refilled. Their permit was suspended for a period of sixty days. Thereafter that judgment of suspension was reversed by the Court of Common Pleas and from that judgment of reversal the appeal was perfected to this Court. In the meantime, the Common Pleas Court had enjoined the enforcement of the suspension…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. B.P.O.E. v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Harstell Operating Co. v. Liquor Control Commission, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1964
  3. Klingbeil v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API