Harstell Operating Co. v. Liquor Control Commission
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
1Opinion of the CourtHarter, J.
This matter is in the coart by way of an appeal ander Section 119.12, Revised Code, from an order of the Liqaor Control Commission apon a hearing on a citation asserting five violations of regalations of the commission. The commission foand, on the evidence addaced before it, that the Department of Liqaor Control had proven violations numbered 1, 3 and 5 by the reqaisite evidence bat had failed to prove violations 2 and 4. On these findings, the commission ordered a 100-day sns-pension as to each of the three violations, sach saspensions to ran concarrently.
There is a measare of confasion in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Wittenberg v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
- Smith v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
- Ross v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1954