Legal Opinion

Mularkey v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

This case was here before and is reported in 196 Wis. 400, 220 N. W. 234. The question presented on the former review was whether or not certain exhibits seized on a purported search warrant were properly received in evidence. The search warrant was held void under Glodowski v. State, 196 Wis. 265, 220 N. W. 227, the evidence not admissible, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

When the case came up for trial the second time the court conducted an investigation to determine whether or not the officers had reasonable grounds' for searching the automobile in question without a search warrant.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Glodowski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
  4. State v. AbramsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Skaggs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. TappaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. HaukCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  3. Hicks v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. State v. BidwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Hicks v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API