Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCuen v. Harris

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 17, 1995No. 94-1196Published

1Dissent

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The ultimate issue before this court is whether the Pulaski Chancery Court has authority or jurisdiction to interpose equity in matters relating to the procedures to be followed by the Secretary of State in publishing notice relating to the conduct of a political election, or, stated another way, can equity jurisdiction be interposed for the protection of rights which are merely political, and be invoked for the purpose of restraining the holding, directing or controlling the mode, or determining the rules of law concerning how…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bailey v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Christian Civic Action Committee v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Robinson v. Craighead County Board of Election CommissionersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Page v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Catlett v. Republican Party of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API