United States v. Lucy Velez
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:
Although the jury ordinarily finds the facts and applies the law, the trial judge, in delivering his charge, bears the weighty responsibility of untangling the skein of legal principles. Thus, we must be sensitive to prejudicial errors in the court’s instructions, lest the jury’s verdict become the product of caprice rather than a true application of law to fact. In this case, we hold that the district judge’s failure in his supplemental instructions to recharge the jury on willful membership in the conspiracy as an element of that offense requires reversal of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Harold v. Gleason, Paul Luftig and J. Michael CarterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Frank Viserto, Jr., Richard Rocco, Joseph Solce, Garnet Johnson, Sarah Payne, Howard Williams and Prentiss CovingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. James F. Bolden, United States of America v. George E. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Derek A. Vaughn, Zaza Leslie LindoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Michael John Canino, James Gilbert Marcum, John G. Flynn, and David Leonard MalkinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Gary LaddCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Russell BufalinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. BarlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.