Legal Opinion

Horan v. Varian

California Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 8700PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

On appeal by the defendant from a judgment in an action in partition, this court modified the interlocutory decree by striking out two whole paragraphs thereof and inserting new provisions in their stead. The interlocutory decree, as modified, was affirmed. The judgment was silent as to costs, but, through mistake and inadvertence, and contrary to the provisions of rule XXIII of this court, the remittitur, when issued, contained a provision that respondents recover costs on appeal. The appellant has made a motion to recall the remittitur for the purpose of striking therefrom the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. StevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Estate of SteehlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Markwort v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. O'Hare v. Peacock Dairies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Wilson v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API