WALKER v. the STATE.

Because there was sufficient evidence to support the asportation element of kidnapping under the test enunciated in Garza v. State , 284 Ga. 696, 702 (1), 670 S.E.2d 73 (2008), I would affirm the kidnapping conviction. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent in part from the majority opinion.1

In the present case, the forced movement of the victim occurred after the armed robbery was complete and was not an inherent part of that offense. The majority, however, concludes that the Garza test *308for asportation was not satisfied because the victim's movement was minimal in duration and distance and the…