Legal Opinion

Ahmad Abu Elreich v. Waymo, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 22, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00814Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AHMAD ABU ELREICH, Case No. 1:25-cv-00814-JLT-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE 13 v. (Doc. 33-1) 14 WAYMO, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO 15 GRANT DEFENDANTS UBER Defendants. TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WAYMO, 16 LLC’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV. P. 12(b)(6) AND TO MOOT 17 DEFENDANT WAYMO, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 18

1915(e)(2).1 19 (Docs. 33, 36, 37) 20 FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 21 22 Pending before the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API