Legal Opinion

Wunsch v. McGraw

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1892No. 407PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Superior Cou/rt, King‘County. Action by M. Wunsch, A. Heilbronner and H. Brunn, co-partners as M. Wunsch & Co., against John H. Mc-Graw, sheriff, to determine the priority of certain executions. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J. —

One White was, prior to the 26th day of November, 1890, a retail jeweler in the city of Seattle, and indebted to J. F. Martin, Thomas J. Carroll, John A. Black, G. O. Haller, Nordman Bros, and M. Wunsch & Co. On that date all of said parties excepting the last named firm obtained judgments and had executions issued against White. The executions of Martin, Carroll and Black were *73placed in the hands of the respondent McGraw, who was then sheriff; at the time of the delivery of these writs to the sheriff he was directed by the parties for whom…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davidson v. WaldronIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Reynolds v. StrembackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832
  3. Mentz v. HammanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  4. Eberle v. MayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
  5. Berry v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1811

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hendrie v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. R. Wallace & Sons Manufacturing Co. v. SharickWashington Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API