Legal Opinion
Grogan v. DeSapio
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 6, 1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
15 N.J. Super. 604 (1951)
83 A.2d 809
JOHN J. GROGAN, EDWARD J. BORRONE AND CARMELA FINIZIO, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
FRED M. DeSAPIO, MICHAEL M. BORELLI, THOMAS A. GALLO, THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, N.J., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided September 6, 1951.
Messrs. McGlynn, Weintraub & Stein (Mr. Joseph Weintraub appearing), attorneys for plaintiffs.
Mr. Dominick J. Marrone (Mr. Otmar J. Pellet appearing), attorney for defendants.
HARTSHORNE,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Communications Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Holcombe v. Trenton White City Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912
- Haines v. Burlington County Bridge CommissionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Herrington v. District Township of ListonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- American Grocery Co. v. Board of Commissioners of New BrunswickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crifasi v. Governing Body of Borough of OaklandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District v. Washoe County Board of County CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Smith v. GhigliottyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Higgins v. DenverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Grogan v. De SapioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.