Legal Opinion

Patrick v. Burget

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 30, 1986No. Nos. 85-3759, 85-4071PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Appellants, partners in the Astoria Clinic, a medical clinic, appeal from a jury verdict in favor of Dr. Timothy Patrick, a surgeon in Astoria, for violations of Sherman Act sections 1 and 2 and for interference with prospective economic advantage under Oregon law. Because the conduct at the heart of the antitrust claims is exempt from liability under the state action doctrine, we reverse the judgment on the Sher*1502man Act claims. Because the trial court failed to instruct the jury properly as to applicable statutory immunities, we reverse the judgment on the state law…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Simon J. Pinhas v. Summit Health, Ltd. Midway Hospital Medical Center the Medical Staff of Midway Hospital Medical Center Mitchell FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Miller v. Indiana HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Shahawy v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Metro Mobile CTS, Inc. v. Newvector Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1987
  5. City Communications, Inc. v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API