Heublein v. Wight
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, District Judge.
The defendants are the Sherwood Distilling Company, a Maryland corporation, hereinafter called the Company, John H. Wight, its president, his brother, William H. Wight, its secretary-treasurer, and his son, Frank F. Wight, one of its salesmen. They are all citizens of Mainland. The two elder Wights between them hold a majority of its capital stock. Each of the three individual defendants is in receipt of a very substantial salary from the Company. These salaries are fixed by the directors. Each of them is a director, and the three of them constitute a majority of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Jacobson v. . Brooklyn Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Cooper v. YoakumTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Francis v. Brigham-Hopkins Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Wight v. HeubleinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gallin v. National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- Wight v. HeubleinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
- Sacajawea Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Skookum Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921