Legal Opinion

Heublein v. Wight

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 19, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, District Judge.

The defendants are the Sherwood Distilling Company, a Maryland corporation, hereinafter called the Company, John H. Wight, its president, his brother, William H. Wight, its secretary-treasurer, and his son, Frank F. Wight, one of its salesmen. They are all citizens of Mainland. The two elder Wights between them hold a majority of its capital stock. Each of the three individual defendants is in receipt of a very substantial salary from the Company. These salaries are fixed by the directors. Each of them is a director, and the three of them constitute a majority of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Jacobson v. . Brooklyn Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Cooper v. YoakumTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Francis v. Brigham-Hopkins Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  5. Wight v. HeubleinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gallin v. National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Wight v. HeubleinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
  3. Sacajawea Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Skookum Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API