Legal Opinion

MacKay v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 14, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action for the specific performance of a contract to indorse a guaranty on certain certificates of stock, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County. The railroad company filed a demurrer, and the other defendants answered, admitting the truth of the complaint. Judgment on these pleadings (Reed, J.) for the plaintiffs, and appeal by the railroad company.

Read the full summary

Action for the specific performance of a contract to indorse a guaranty on certain certificates of stock, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County. The railroad company filed a demurrer, and the other defendants answered, admitting the truth of the complaint. Judgment on these pleadings (Reed, J.) for the plaintiffs, and appeal by the railroad company. The complaint stated this case: On June 25th, 1906, an agreement was made between Frederick W. Kendrick, Timothy E. Byrnes, and the Consolidated Railway Company, a Connecticut corporation, they being therein designated as the…

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.

The Superior Court, in an action brought in June, 1908, against the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company as “a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut and located and having its principal place of business in the town of New Haven”, has ordered it to perform specifically a contract to which it was a party, entered into in that town on June 25th, 1906. This contract, described in the complaint as Exhibit C, was for the guaranty by the Consolidated Railway Company, a corporation incorporated by this State, of certain certificates of ownership…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Graham v. Boston, Hartford & Erie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Nashua and Lowell Railroad v. Boston and Lowell RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Patch v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edwards v. KirkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. Anderson v. Heartland Oil & Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Bator v. United Sausage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Difrancesco v. KennedySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. McHenry County v. BradyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API