Legal Opinion
Tucker Durnford v. Musclepharm Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 12, 2018No. 16-15374PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TUCKER DURNFORD, No. 16-15374 individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 3:15-cv-00413-HSG v. OPINION MUSCLEPHARM CORP., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 15, 2017 San Francisco, California Filed October 12, 2018 Before: Marsha S. Berzon and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges, and William K. Sessions III, * District Judge.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Intl Brotherhood of Teamsters v. FmcsaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Jensen v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Robert Cohen v. Conagra Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Scheibe v. Prosupps USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Kym Pardini v. Unilever United States, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.