Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Bourk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeals (1) from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 6, 1989, which assessed Homecraft Industries, Inc. for additional unemployment insurance contributions, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed May 5, 1989, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision.

The powers reserved by Homecraft Industries, Inc. were sufficient to establish the direction and control necessary for its salespersons to be considered employees (see, Matter of Cohen [Blinder, Robinson & Co.—Roberts], 67 NY2d 683). While there were factors pointing to independent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Di Maria v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. In Re the Claim of CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. In re Rich Plan of Syracuse, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API