Legal Opinion

Griesser v. National Railroad Passenger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 2000No. 2614 EDA 1999PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LALLY-GREEN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Joseph Griesser, appeals from the judgment entered October 26, 1999, following a jury trial. This case presents an issue of first impression in Pennsylvania regarding the interplay of the collateral source rule and the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). 1 Appellant argues that the trial court erred by introducing evidence which is barred by the collateral source rule. We agree and, therefore, vacate the judgment.

¶ 2 The facts of the case are as follows. On February 7, 1994, Appellant sustained injuries in the course of his employment after falling backward…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Tipton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Johnson v. BeaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Emmett E. Page v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  5. Brinich v. JenckaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Deyarmin v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Mize-Kurzman v. Marin Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. John Giza v. Bnsf Railway CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. Nigra v. WalshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Deeds Ex Rel. Renzulli v. University of Pennsylvania Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API