Legal Opinion

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 29, 2009No. 07-352CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WHEELER, Judge.

In this breach of contract action, the Court is faced with a threshold question of whether a binding contract exists for the services rendered. Plaintiff Pacific Gas and Electric Company (“PG & E”) asserts that, after the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”), approved a Grid Management Pass Through Tariff (the “Tariff”), the Tariff became a binding contract between PG & E and the Western Area Power Administration (“Western”), an agency within the United States Department of Energy. In the alternative, PG & E…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michigan Electric Transmission Co. v. Midland Cogeneration Venture, Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API