Kaplan v. Kaplan
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
By motion for judgment on the pleadings the defendant has raised the question whether an action for separation may be brought by an insane spouse through her guardian ad litem. The right to bring a matrimonial action in the civil courts is statutory. At common law only the ecclesiastical courts had jurisdiction.
The right to bring an action for separation is defined and regulated by article 69 of the Civil Practice Act and by some sections of article 70. These articles contain no express provision authorizing a guardian ad litem to bring such an action. The appellant argues that such authority…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Walter v. . WalterNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Birdzell v. Birdzell ex rel. TuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Worthy v. WorthySupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
- Wray v. WraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Mims v. MimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mohrmann v. KobNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Weinberg v. WeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Brewington v. BrewingtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Sengstack v. SengstackNew York Supreme Court · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.