Legal Opinion
Sengstack v. Sengstack
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 13, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSidney A. Fine, J.
In this action for a separation brought by the plaintiff wife against the defendant husband, plaintiff has made a motion for temporary alimony and counsel fees, and defendant has made (a) a motion pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment dismissing the complaint on the grounds that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject of the action and that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, or, in the alternative, for an order pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice striking out certain specified paragraphs of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wurster v. . ArmfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Goodale v. . LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Matter of FrankNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Houghton v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- In re CurtissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Claim of Martin v. C. A. Productions Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Borrillo v. Beekman Downtown HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Chemical Bank v. Aetna InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- In re KargerNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Sengstack v. SengstackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957