Terance Frazier v. City of Fresno
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TERRANCE FRAZIER, et al., No. 1:20-cv-01069-DAD-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 14 CITY OF FRESNO, et al., MOTION TO DISMISS 15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 6) 16 17 18 This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint 19 pursuant to Federal Civil Procedure Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) for lack of subject matter 20 jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. No. 6.) Pursuant 21 to General…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.