Legal Opinion
Hill v. Board of Trustees of Michigan State University
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided November 16, 2001No. 5:01-cv-00005PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Erik Hill (“Hill”), filed a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants, Michigan State University (“MSU”) and Lee June (“June”), Vice President for Student Affairs and Services, following his suspension as a student from MSU in April 1999. Defendants now move this Court for summary judgment. The Court has concluded that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the issues presented.
Facts
Hill enrolled at MSU as a freshman in the Fall of 1998. On March 16, 1999, he was placed on “warning probation” for two semesters after he violated residence hall…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Doe v. Ohio State UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Castle v. Appalachian Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- DeFABIO v. East Hampton Union Free School Dist.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Gomes v. University of Maine SystemDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
- Salau v. DentonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.