State v. Henderson
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Callaway Circuit Coiwt. — Hon. J. A. Hockaday, Judge. No exception was taken, or objection saved, to the action of the court in sustaining the motion to quash the indictment, and, hence, the judgment should be affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Callaway county for wilfully failing to keep and render a true account of the fees received by him in his official capacity as clerk of the county court of said county, and for wilfully failing to pay into the treasury of said county fees, alleged to have been received by him as such clerk, in excess of the compensation allowed him by law. The defendant filed his motion to quash the indictment, which, being sustained, the state has brought the case here' by appeal.
*293The rule in this state is well settled that a motion to quash an indictment does…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851
- State v. VincentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- State v. GeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- State v. ThrustonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FrakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- State v. FinleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- State v. TookerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- City of Columbia v. DorseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.