Legal Opinion

State v. Fraker

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 2, 1897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Bay Circuit Court. — Hon. E. J. Broaddus, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.

This is an appeal by the state of Missouri from a judgment of the circuit court of Ray *259county quashing an indictment against the respondent. The indictment was discussed with much ability by both sides. The case has some very unusual features and has excited much interest, particularly in its legal aspects. The motion to quash the indictment was sustaiued. The prosecuting attorney filed no bill of exceptions and the motion to quash the indictment was not therefore made a part of the record. That we may not be misunderstood we state that the clerk has copied the different motions to quash into…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851
  2. State v. VincentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  3. State v. GeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. State v. Fortune & HannanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
  5. State v. ThrustonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shohoney v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. State v. BrennanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. State v. FinleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. State v. SettleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Krueger v. Brenham Furniture Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API