Legal Opinion

Lockley v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 11, 2003PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

PORITZ, C.J.

This Court has held that a plaintiff who seeks punitive damages based on an alleged violation of the Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A 10:5-1 to -49, by a public or private entity must prove that upper level management acted in such manner as to warrant the imposition of those damages. This case presents two questions: whether the trial court’s instructions (1) sufficiently informed the jury in respect of the upper level management determination, and (2) properly described the considerations relevant to the calculation of a punitive…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  4. Hurley v. Atlantic City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Abbamont v. Piscataway Township Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Battaglia v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  2. Tonique Griffin v. City of East Orange (074937)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  3. Green v. Jersey City Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  4. Ramon Cuevas v. Wentworth Group(075077)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  5. Ilda Aguas v. State of New Jersey (072467)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API