Lockley v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
PORITZ, C.J.
This Court has held that a plaintiff who seeks punitive damages based on an alleged violation of the Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A 10:5-1 to -49, by a public or private entity must prove that upper level management acted in such manner as to warrant the imposition of those damages. This case presents two questions: whether the trial court’s instructions (1) sufficiently informed the jury in respect of the upper level management determination, and (2) properly described the considerations relevant to the calculation of a punitive…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Hurley v. Atlantic City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Abbamont v. Piscataway Township Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Battaglia v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Tonique Griffin v. City of East Orange (074937)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- Green v. Jersey City Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Ramon Cuevas v. Wentworth Group(075077)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- Ilda Aguas v. State of New Jersey (072467)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.