Legal Opinion

Terry v. McClintock

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1879PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Saginaw. Bill to revive suit and enforce decree for the benefit of an assignee of notes, mortgage and decree. # Defendant McClintock appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, _J.

The female defendant, who is the wife of Elias J. Clintoek, subsequent to her marriage but during her minority, received a deed from her uncle, Mr. Dutton, of the east half of lots five and six in block sixty-one of Hoyt’s plat in the city of East Saginaw, and she and her husband went into possession and have since continued to hold and enjoy it. The conveyance to her was made subject to a mortgage however of $2,000 in favor of one Derby, and this burden not only diminished the value of her right in the premises to that amount but was liable to be used to defeat her estate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fitch v. NewberryMichigan Supreme Court · 1843
  2. Perkins v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Webster v. HitchcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  4. American Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. SackettNew York Court of Chancery · 1846
  5. Linton v. PottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1840

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Krachun v. KrachunMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Peatman v. Centerville Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Lynch v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Kohl v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Willard, Exrx. v. StaufferIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API